Die Schwalbe

13 problem(s) found in 2304 milliseconds (displaying 13 problem(s)). [COMMENTDATE>=20200919 AND NOT K='Hilfsrückzüger' AND K='En passant' AND S='PDB Website'] [download as LaTeX]

1 - P1375286
Andrew Buchanan
James Malcom

PDB Website 30/4/2020
P1375286
(6+3)
#2
(-:
1. dxc7ep! b4 2. c8=D,T#

R: 1. ... c8-c6?! and earlier c8=sB?!
play all play one stop play next play all
Supersession of P1380851

Superseded by P1380851

The 2018 FIDE laws state: "3.7.2 on its first move the pawn may move as in 3.7.1 or alternatively it may advance two squares along the same file, provided that both squares are unoccupied."

Hence Black's newborn 8th rank pawn, which has never been moved before, reserves the right to commence a double-step on its first move, and likewise White receives the right to capture it en passant as they do with a 7th rank pawn.
Henrik Juel: This un-dummy-pawn is like a pawn created on c8 by the Einstein condition
The retroplay looks wrong, what about 1... d8-d6!? 2.d7-d8=sB!? c6xYb5 (2020-04-30)
James Malcom: That makes much more sense Henrik. I have edited it accordingly. (2020-04-30)
A.Buchanan: You don't like Adrian's (: haha? What about :) then? In heraldic terms, it would be described as "regardant". See 270 on https://www.heraldica.org/cgi-bin/atlas.pl?12. I don't know the word for "non-regardant", which is the default direction for the head, e.g. most of the others on that page.
We could replace wBa6a7 with wSa6, but alas having the 3rd knight is non-thematic & distracting. The other thing I would've liked to do is empty b2 so the promotion is forced to be to D. Such a tiny problem should have precision promotion. Needs more thinking. (2020-05-01)
James Malcom: UPDATE: The position has been edited to have one less piece and a precise queen promotion. (2020-10-12)
A.Buchanan: There is dialogue here which is now orphaned by a change of diagram with new matrix. Suggest we revert to the older diagram and mark it superseded by a new PDB entry here (2020-10-12)
James Malcom: I agree-it is now done. (2020-10-12)
more ...
comment
Keywords: En passant as key, Joke, Joke promotion (b), Tolerated dual promotion (D/T), Promotion (D/T), Superseded by (P1380851)
Genre: 2#, Retro
FEN: k7/PN1N4/PKpP4/1p6/8/8/8/8
Input: James Malcom, 2020-04-30
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2022-09-18 more...
2 - P1382808
Ronald Turnbull
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 20/01/2012
RT, correction AB
P1382808
(4+12)
h#3
AP
PRA
1. bxc3ep 0-0! (for AP reasons, not 1...Kf2?/Th2? etc) 2. Ta1 Txa1 3. Kc4 Txa4#
1. fxe3ep 0-0! (for AP reasons, not 1...Tf1?/Txh3? etc) b2 Txf3 3. Tc3 Tf4#
play all play one stop play next play all
For AP as for anything else, the default meta-convention is PRA before RS. Here we use AP to lock down wK & wTh1, so the last move was R: 1. c2-c4 or 1. e2-e4. There is a different h#3 in either case, beginning with ep and then 0-0.
Chessically corrects P1012059 following discussions. It's doubtful that AP logic works as simplistically described here, so this may still be unsound logically. Nevertheless, might as well fix the chess!
See P1399112, where the two parts each prove that one side of White castling rights remain. If this is correct, and only *one* part is required per castling, this implies that this Turnbull-Buchanan problem doesn’t work. For one part we have solution c_S and tries c_T1 & c_T2. In the other part, solution e_S and tries e_T1 & e_T2. Any of 5 combinations work:
c_S + e_S
c_S + e_T1
c_S + e_T2
c_T1 + e_S
c_T2 + e_S
because they all confirm that White retains castling rights.
Classify this problem as Golden Age because it’s on the wrong side of the evolving standard.
A.Buchanan: Let ??? Indicate respectively that w00, c ep & e ep are ok. Then YYN, YNY, NYN, NNY, NNN are the contenders.
Under PRA we reduce to YYN, YNY & NNN but the last has no solution so not the right paradigm.
Under SPRA with AP we reduce to YYN, YNY. Each considered as a separate part has kind of AP h#3, but I don’t understand how consolidation would take place over PRA anyway
Under RS with AP, we have 2 solutions assuming again that no consolidation. (2022-03-23)
comment
Keywords: a posteriori (AP) (Type Petrovic - cee), En passant as key (2), Castling (wk), Retro Strategy (RS), Golden Age (AP unconsolidated)
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: Forward logic sound by Popeye v4.85 However, seems that AP logic is not sound
FEN: 8/8/8/1nr1n3/ppPkPp2/rp1p1p1p/8/4K2R
Input: A.Buchanan, 2020-12-08
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2023-04-06 more...
3 - P1386614
Thomas R. Dawson
Lion Xray
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 19/02/2021
TRD, version LX & AB
P1386614
(13+9) C+
#2
1. hxg6ep+ Lg5 2. Dxg5#
R: 1. g7-g5 Te3-e7+ 2. Kg5-h6+ Lf5-h7+ 3. Kf6-g5 Sd6-e8+
play all play one stop play next play all
Black has captured 3 white units. dxcxb accounts for 2. With only one left over, we know that bPh3 never captured. So to explain wPh4, White must have played fxgxh or hxgxh. Combined with dxcxb & exdxcxb, that accounts for all of White's captures.
(a) If White played fxgxh, then the original [wPh] was "waylaid" by an officer, without promoting or capturing.
(b) If White played hxgxh, then the original [wPf] did not capture. We know that [bPf] or [bPg] promoted, using at most one capture.
(b.1) If Black did capture fxg or fxe, then [wPf] did promote to make the balance, and Black's last move can't have been fxg, or the f-file would be blocked to wP.
(b.2) If Black didn't capture fxg or fxe, then [wPf] was waylaid to clear the way for [bPf] to promote.
We don't know which of these three possibilities happened, but in every case:
(1) All captures are accounted for (so e.g. Kg5xSh6 was not possible).
(2) Black did not just play f6xg5.
If Black just played g6-g5, retract prior checking moves and discover retropat as g6 is blocked preventing discovered check by wB now on h7. By elimination, last move was g7-g5 and ep key is ok.
Removes 2 pieces from P1106295, and enriches the retro logic
Henrik Juel: Nice clean-up and careful retro argumentation (2021-02-18)
A.Buchanan: Thanks Henrik - in fact I've just seen that one can uniquely retract a couple of single moves further, see the animation (2021-02-19)
comment
Keywords: En passant as key, Last Moves? (6)
Genre: 2#, Retro
Computer test: HC+ retro musing + Popeye v4.85
FEN: 3KN3/rPp1R2B/pp5k/Q5pP/PPP4b/1p4Pp/1P6/2B5
Input: A.Buchanan, 2021-02-18
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2021-04-16 more...
4 - P1388090
Yuri Bilokin
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 03/04/2021
after Martin Gohn
P1388090
(3+7) C+
h#5
1. Kd7 g4 2. Lh1 Lg2 3. Ke6 Lh3 4. Ld5 g5+ 5. f5 gxf6ep#
play all play one stop play next play all
correction of P0505412 with greater economy
more ...
comment
Keywords: Bahnung, En passant as mating move, Model mate
Genre: h#
Computer test: C+, Gustav 4.1d, Brute Force
FEN: B4n2/1bk2pKn/3q4/4p3/8/8/6P1/8
Input: A.Buchanan, 2021-04-03
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2021-11-22 more...
5 - P1389660
Werner Kuntsche
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 14/05/2021
WK, correction AB
P1389660
(10+11) C+
h#2
1. exd3ep g5 2. Lb3 Se6#
play all play one stop play next play all
HJ: Black captured all six missing white men with dxe, exfxgxh, and fxgxh.
So White captured all five missing black men with axb, bxa, cxb/d, and e2xf3xg4, and promoted twice.
Last move was d2-d4, because all other attempts give illegal checks, so the ep key is legitimized.
Corrects P1389486
more ...
comment
Keywords: En passant as key
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: HC+ Popeye 4.61 with analysis
FEN: 8/6pp/7b/7P/P1kPpNPR/n1p2B1p/p4PPp/2Kb4
Input: A.Buchanan, 2021-05-16
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2021-05-16 more...
6 - P1396159
Tivadar Kardos
James Malcom
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 24/11/2021
TK, correction JM & AB
P1396159
(6+15) C+
h#3
1. dxe3ep+ Kxc4 2. Lc3 Sxc2 3. Ta5 axb3#
R: 1. e2-e4 Tf3-d3+ 2. Ke4-d5
play all play one stop play next play all
See P0003211

Example Proof Game: 1. b3 a5 2. c4 a4 3. Na3 b5 4. d4 c5 5. Bg5 h6 6. f4 hxg5 7. Nf3 gxf4 8. Qd3 bxc4 9. Nc2 axb3 10. Rc1 Bb7 11. Na1 Nf6 12. Rc3 Nh5 13. Qe3 fxe3 14. Nd2 exd2+ 15. Kf2 Nf4 16. Rg1 Nh3+ 17. gxh3 Bh1 18. Rcg3 Ra6 19. Rg6 Rf6+ 20. Ke3 Rh5 21. Bg2 Nc6 22. Be4 Na5 23. Bc2 bxc2 24. R1g4 Rf3+ 25. Ke4 Nb3 26. Rd6 exd6 27. Rf4 Qh4 28. Rg4 Qe1 29. Rf4 Kd8 30. Rg4 Kc7 31. Rf4 Kb6 32. Rg4 Ka5 33. Rf4 Ka4 34. Rg4 Rhf5 35. Rh4 g5 36. Rg4 Bg7 37. Rh4 Be5 38. Rf4 cxd4 39. Rg4 f6 40. Rh4 Qf1 41. Rf4 gxf4 42. Kd5 Rd3+ 43. e4
Henrik Juel: Black pawns captured all 10 missing white men, and White captured g2xSh3
Last move was not e3-e4 (because of the check from Lh1), but e2-e4
HC+ Popeye 4.61 (2021-11-24)
A.Buchanan: I’d like to claim that Popeye + Retractor + example proof game means this problem is C+. If not, what more would be required. (2021-11-24)
Henrik Juel: I guess that suffices (2021-11-24)
comment
Keywords: En passant as key, Checking key
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: C+ Popeye 4.61 for forward play Retractor 2.0 for retraction Lichess to check demo game
FEN: 8/3p4/3p1p2/3Kbr2/k1ppPp2/1n1r3P/P1pp3P/N4q1b
Input: James Malcom, 2021-11-24
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2023-07-13 more...
7 - P1396163
Tivadar Kardos
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 24/11/2021
TK, correction AB
P1396163
(8+14) C+
h#3
1. cxb3ep+ Sb4+ 2. Kb1 Sxe2 3. b2 0-0#
R: 1. b2-b4 Tc3-a3+ 2. Sa3-c2
play all play one stop play next play all
Black captured 8 white men with pawns. Critically sBd & sBe never captured, therefore White pawns captured onto d- & e-files (to explain the pawn inversions there). Therefore wBb4 did not come from c3.
See P0574383.

With the ink still wet on this correction, I would like to remove sD. Sound by Popeye & Retractor, but needs an adapted proof game for C+.

Proof Game: 1. c4 a6 2. g3 Nc6 3. Bg2 Na5 4. Bc6 h5 5. Bb5 axb5 6. g4 c5 7. d4 cxd4 8. e4 f5 9. Be3 fxe4 10. f4 g5 11. Qf3 Nb3 12. Na3 hxg4 13. Nc2 gxf3 14. Rd1 Na1 15. Rd2 Ra3 16. Rg2 Rc3 17. a4 d3 18. Bf2 e3 19. Bg3 e5 20. Re2 e4 21. a5 d5 22. a6 d4 23. a7 Qd5 24. a8=R Qe5 25. Rf2 Kd7 26. Re2 Nf6 27. Rd2 Nd5 28. cxd5 Kd6 29. Rf2 Kc5 30. Re2 b6 31. Rd2 Kc4 32. fxe5 Kb3 33. Re2 fxe2 34. Rb8 Bg4 35. Rb7 Bf3 36. Rc7 Ka2 37. Bf4 gxf4 38. Rc6 Bb4 39. Rc5 Rh3 40. Na3 Ba5 41. Rc4 bxc4 42. Nc2 Ra3+ 43. b4
A.Buchanan: 6n1/8/1q6/b7/1Ppppp2/r2ppp1r/k1N1p2P/n3K1NR has one less piece again, but I prefer the current version as retro logic is more interesting. (2021-11-26)
James Malcom: Enjoy an optimal PG Andrew. The total sum of the queen & knight journeys is 8 no matter which knight ends up on a1. (2021-11-27)
A.Buchanan: :-) thanks James (2021-11-27)
more ...
comment
Keywords: En passant as key, Castling (wk)
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: C+ Popeye 4.61, Retractor 2.0 & example proof game.
FEN: 8/8/1p6/b2PP3/1Ppppp2/r2ppb1r/k1N1p2P/n3K1NR
Input: A.Buchanan, 2021-11-24
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2023-08-15 more...
8 - P1397613
Tivadar Kardos
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 31/12/2021
TK, correction AB
P1397613
(6+4) C+
hs#4
1. d4 Td2 2. Lc3 Lc1 3. d5+ e5+ 4. dxe6ep+ Td4#
play all play one stop play next play all
Fixes cook in P1303210, and improves economy & precision
more ...
comment
Keywords: En passant
Genre: Fairies
Computer test: C+, Gustav 4.2a, Brute Force
FEN: 4R3/4p3/5k2/8/5K2/b4PR1/1r1P4/B7
Input: A.Buchanan, 2021-12-31
Last update: James Malcom, 2022-01-02 more...
9 - P1398014
Tivadar Kardos
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 08/01/2022
TK, correction AB
P1398014
(6+16) C+
h#3
1. bxc3ep+ d3 2. 0-0 Tf4 3. Kh8 Txf8#
play all play one stop play next play all
Not R: 1. c3-c4? La6xb5? because Black's 10 captures are already accounted for: 6 pawn captures on files a-d, e.g.: bax, cxbxa, dxcxbxa + 4 waylaid pawns on files e-h or maybe 2 more pawn captures if bPe & bPf cross-capture.
Corrected version of P0003264, with extra tightness.
more ...
comment
Keywords: En passant as key, Castling (sk)
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: HC+ Popeye 4.61
FEN: N3k2r/6pp/1pn5/Pb2p3/RpP5/pr2qp2/p2P2n1/5Kb1
Input: A.Buchanan, 2022-01-07
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2022-03-20 more...
10 - P1399112
Werner Kuntsche
Valery Liskovets
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 14/02/2022
WK, correction AB
P1399112
(5+8) C+
h#3 AP

No solutions except for those beginning with e.p.
297 candidate solutions begin 1.gxf3ep, but only one includes castling. Queenside 2. ... 0-0-0
22 candidate solutions begin 1.fcxd3ep, but only one includes castling. Kingside 2. ... 0-0
In some way, these are trying to be combined so that from AP perspective, White's last move can only have been double hop with wBd or wBf.
We need a clear delineation of the precise PRA-AP algorithm to be followed.

The point: if this problem is "sound", then surely P1382808 is "unsound", because there only one of the two parts needs to prove that White castling rights remain, so there are 4 cooks.
This is an important schema for AP. Previous cooked problems P0002476 & P0004295 (together with versions of each lacking sBe3) had multiple chess cooks that do not involve e.p. as key. This chessically sound composition allows us to focus on the fundamental theoretical issue of AP.

The double e.p. idea cannot work as an AP retro strategy problem, because one can never prove that one double pawn hop rather than the other occurred. PRA+AP seems potentially feasible, but I see no clear statement of how the normal PRA method should be extended to this case. All prescriptive suggestions are welcome.

In WinChloe, I found a correction from 2002 by Valery Liskovitz, just posted in PDB as P1401449. However it used three extra pawns, rather than 2, so the current version still has merit, but I will add Valery as co-corrector.

See also P1399178.
more ...
comment
Keywords: a posteriori (AP) (Type Petrovic), En passant as key (2), Symmetrical position, Symmetrical solution, Castling (wb)
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: HC+ Forward play proved by Popeye v4.87 AP logic requires some framework but I think we know we want this cool idea to end up being sound.
FEN: 8/8/2p3p1/8/2pPkPp1/2n1p1n1/8/R3K2R
Input: A.Buchanan, 2022-02-14
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2022-05-24 more...
11 - P1401525
Joao Baptista Santiago
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 30/05/2022
JBS, correction AB
P1401525
(11+14) C+
h#2* (AP)
1. ... Kd2 2. e3+ fxe3#
1. bxc3ep b3 2. Kxd3 0-0-0#
play all play one stop play next play all
Black has no tempo moves to convert the set play to a main play solution. Rc5~,Se5~,e3,Sf1 all disrupt the set play.
The main play castling is needed both for the mate and for the legitimization.
Corrects P1401496
Henrik Juel: analysis
Black captured [Pa2] with an officer and cxb, dxe, exf, and f3xg2
White captured g4xLh5 and h2xDg3, so if he may castle, Black may capture ep now (2022-05-30)
A.Buchanan: A detail I hadn't noticed: bPh never captured, so wPh5 must have arrived on h-file *above* the light square h3. If it was gxh4, then there was no light square to capture light bB, so it was gxh5. But the capture might have been h3xBg4xQh5. The problem is still sound: the last move can't have been h4-h5. (2022-05-30)
more ...
comment
Keywords: a posteriori (AP) (Type Petrovic), Castling (wg), En passant as key
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: HC+ Popeye 4.61 and analysis
FEN: 8/8/pp2P3/brr1n2P/1pPkp1p1/B2P1pPp/1P3Ppn/R3K1N1
Input: A.Buchanan, 2022-05-30
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2022-05-30 more...
12 - P1401526
Zoltan Laborczi
Gabor Tar
Andrew Buchanan

PDB Website 30/05/2022
ZL & GT, version AB
P1401526
(4+8) C+
h#2 (AP)
3.1...
1. Tb3 Lxc4 2. Txb4 Txa2#
1. Kxb4 Tb1+ 2. Ka4 Lb5#
1. cxb3ep 0-0-0! (Td1?) 2. e4 Td4#
play all play one stop play next play all
Economizes P1080354 by 2 units, adding a solution.
more ...
comment
Keywords: a posteriori (AP) (Type Petrovic), Castling (wg), En passant as key
Genre: h#, Retro
Computer test: C+ Popeye 4.61
FEN: 8/1p6/B7/p3p3/kPp5/r1p5/p7/R3K3
Input: A.Buchanan, 2022-05-30
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2023-05-21 more...
13 - P1402593
Andrew Buchanan
PDB Website 09/07/2022
after G.P.Latzel
P1402593
(10+4)
h#1.75 (-:
hint rot13: pbqrk negvpyr svsgrra
0. ... [-bPg5] 1. Lxb3 Ta8#
play all play one stop play next play all
Clearly an unfinished move joke. By a usual convention for these things, a player might be halfway through a castling, an en passant, or a promotion. 1.75 is nearly 2.0, so Black would be the moving player.

Black is not in the middle of an e.p. or castling, so the only possibility is a promotion. Black has lifted up the pawn, to replace it with an officer on the 8th rank. However, White has apparently made 12 pawn captures, accounting for all missing Black units, so Black is not part way through promoting a pawn.

Therefore it's not Black in the middle of a move. By a joke application of Article 15, we say that it's *White* in the middle of a move instead. So 1.75 - 0.5 = 1.25 and it's h#1.25.

- White can't be part way through a promotion, because all White pawns are on the board.
- If White were in the middle of castling, then the pawn capture balance would be ok, but Black would have no prior move.
- If White were in the middle of en passant h5xg6, then bPg5 can help with capture balance, but still there is one capture short for the balance.
- So White is in the middle of en passant f5xg6. If we complete the joke move by removing bPg5, then the position is legal, with 12 White pawn captures and 13 missing Black units. A sound h#1 awaits.
After P0004346
Henrik Juel: Not completion of 0-0-0, because Black has no last move
Completion of f5xg6ep is feasible, and then 1.Lxb3 Ta8#
Stipulation should be h#1.25, I think (2022-07-10)
A.Buchanan: Hi Henrik: it’s intended to be h#1.75 :-) Can black complete any Valladao move? And if not then what do we do? :-) (2022-07-10)
Henrik Juel: Thanks Andrew
So Black must complete a move, but his four men are stuck, and white pawns captured the remaining 12 black men; so there is nothing for Black to complete
Looks like a weird joke... (2022-07-10)
A.Buchanan: Sorry you don't like the Valladao joke Henrik. "1.75 minus 0.5 = 1.25" is a novel way to combine "unfinished move" with Article 15. I also like the fact that all the cases of pawn capture counting are exact, with no "retro dressing" unit purely to contribute to a balance.s (2022-07-10)
comment
Keywords: Joke, Complete an unfinished move, En passant, Castling (wg Not!), Promotion (Not!), No legal last move for Black
Genre: h#, Retro
FEN: 7k/5p1P/5PPP/1P4p1/b7/1P6/6PP/R1K5
Input: A.Buchanan, 2022-07-10
Last update: A.Buchanan, 2023-12-08 more...
Show statistic for complete result. Show search result faster by using ids.

https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/search.jsp?expression=COMMENTDATE%3E%3D20200919+AND+NOT+K%3D%27Hilfsr%C3%BCckz%C3%BCger%27+AND+K%3D%27En+passant%27+AND+S%3D%27PDB+Website%27

The problems of this query have been registered by the following contributors:

James Malcom (2)
A.Buchanan (11)