Michel Caillaud: cooked by Stelvio 0.93 :
1.b4 c5 2.b5 c4 3.b6 c3 4.bxa7 d5 5.e4 d4 6.f4 d3 7.f5 dxc2 8.d4 g5 9.Lf4 c1=L 10.d5 g4 11.f6 g3 12.fxe7 gxh2 13.g4 c2 14.Lg3 Lf4 15.g5 c1=T 16.g6 Tc6 17.Dd3 f5 18.Sd2 h5 19.g7 Tg6 20.0-0-0 Sf6 21.Te1 h4 22.d6 h3 23.g8=L Th4 24.Lb3 L8h6 25.Ld1 Kf7 26.d7 Dh8 27.d8=T Le6 28.Td4 Sbd7 29.e5 Tf8 30.e8=T Kg8 31.Tc8 Lf7 32.e6 b6 33.e7 Lb8 34.e8=S f4 35.Te7 f3 36.Se2 f2 37.Tg1 h1=S 38.Da6 h2 39.Lh3 f1=S 40.Ta4 Sf2 41.Tc2 h1=L... (2022-12-20)
Paulo Roque: obs: 28...S8d7 (2008-11-22, hidden) more ...
comment

Reto: This is now the new record for the longest computer tested SPG. Strategy seeking takes up all the time, playing the 800 strategies on the other hand is done within a few seconds. (2023-08-11)
Reto: With the upcoming v1.6, this is solved by Stelvio in around 20min. The improvement is due to the fact that the cage in the south-west is now detected (either the wRa1 is captured inside the cage or the wBc1 is captured at home) (2023-09-02)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 63 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 29.5, BP 30.0. (2023-04-15, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung Stelvio 1.2 C+: Keine Lösung: BP 8.5, 9.0.
10. dxc6ep++ Doppelschach. (2023-05-24, hidden) more ...
comment

Sally: Eine eindeutige BwP., die lange Zeit den Längenreord hielt und, wenn auch mit langer Verzögerung, wesentlich zum Boom dieser Gattung in den letzten 15 Jahren beigetragen hat. Im-
mer noch eine faszinierende Aufgabe. Nr. KF-13 Schwalbe Okt. 2005. (2011-12-05)
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Keine Lösung: BP 40.5, BP 41.0. (2023-05-20)
comment

Silvio Baier: Der wesentliche thematische Inhalt ist bereits nach 31,5 Zügen erreicht. Bis dahin ist es C+ (Euclide 0.98). (2010-08-04)
James Malcom: Is this fully C+ then? (2021-01-27)
Henrik Juel: No, only the first 31.5 moves are tested OK (2021-01-27)
James Malcom: No Henrik, as in is the entire problem testable. (2021-01-27)
Henrik Juel: I guess that testing the entire problem would take an unreasonably long time (2021-04-06)
A.Buchanan: It might be possible these days: the motivation for stopping at 31.5 is that the promotion theme had been demonstrated by then. But there’s still e.g. bSb8 as random impostor (2021-04-07)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 50:24:34 Stunden.(hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 34.5, BP 35.0. (2023-05-08)
Henrik Juel: Thanks for your patience, Moldenhauer; more than two days... (2023-05-08)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stelvio 1.11 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 26.0, BP 26.5. (2023-05-08, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung BP 15.5, BP 16.0. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Silvio Baier: C+ (Natch 2.4) (2009-07-15, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung BP 23.0, BP 23.5. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Silvio Baier: C+ (Euclide 0.93) (2009-05-12, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung BP 25.5, BP 26.0. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Henrik Juel: Dual: ... 4.d4 La6 5.d5 Tc8 6.d6 Tc7 7.dxc7 Db8 8.c8L d6 9.Lf5 ... (2004-02-12)
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung BP 19.0, BP 19.5. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Henrik Juel: Black makes 15 captures.
The first 13.0 moves are correct by Euclide 1.0, but it takes some 4 minutes, so a complete test would probably take more than a day (2014-12-09)
paul: Jacobi checked the last 16 moves (in about 20 min). (2018-05-10)
Mario Richter: I would like to label this problem as a "Massacre PG", but the current definition of that term only knows of two-sided MPGs. Perhaps we could make the same differentiation as for "Homebase"?!
Btw., wasn't "popeye" best for such massacres?
rawbats confirms complete correctness of the problem after approx. 25 minutes. (2018-05-11)
Henrik Juel: Yes, Mario, Popeye is fairly good at this type
C+ by Popeye 4.61 in 57 minutes (2018-05-11)
A.Buchanan: @Mario: yes I agree it would be good to make massacre more specific. There are 69 massacres currently, almost all 2-sided, but maybe also some series-movers (unique or non-unique) which are currently not counted? (2018-05-12)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.2 2 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 16.0, BP 16.5. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 25.5, BP 26.0. (2023-04-02)
comment

paul: Correction of P0001580 (2010-09-25)
Silvio Baier: Mit 30....dc+ ist das C+ (Euclide 0.98, Retractor für den letzten Zug) (2011-07-08)
James Malcom: So this is fully C+? (2021-01-27)
Henrik Juel: No, another problem in 30.0 moves ending with 30. Tc2 dxc4+ is tested OK (2021-01-27)
Silvio Baier: Mit 30....dc+ ist das C+ (Euclide 0.98) (2011-07-08, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 65:30:51 Stunden. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 30.0, BP 30.5. (2023-05-08, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösungen BP 12.5, BP 13.0.
Es ist wirklich eine Rarität dass es 2 komplette Lösungen gibt. (2023-05-20)
comment

paul: The last moves are: 14.Ta1 Ta4 15.Sh6 Sa6 16.b8=T Tf8 17.Tb4 Sh8 18.Th4 Tf7 19.Th1 Th4 20. Sg4 Sb4 21. Sf2 La6 22. Sh3 Ld3 23. Sg1 Kg5 24. Kf2 Lg6 25. Ke1
Phoenix-Pronkin theme: wNg1 & wRh1 are promoted, here combined with wK-switchback. (2008-03-24)
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung: BP 23.5, BP 24.0. (2023-05-20, hidden) more ...
comment

Henrik Juel: Cooked acc. to Euclide 1.01, e.g.,
1. Bc2-c4 Ba7-a6 2. Be2-e4 Be7-e6 3. Bf2-f4 Bh7-h5 4. Dd1xh5 Ke8-e7 5. Dh5-b5 Th8-h4 6. Ke1-e2 Th4-g4 7. Bh2-h4 Ba6xb5 8. Bh4-h5 Bb5-b4 9. Bh5-h6 Ke7-d6 10. Bh6-h7 Kd6-c5 11. Th1-h6 Tg4-h4 12. Bh7-h8=D Bg7-g6 13. Dh8-c3 Bb4xc3 14. Ke2-f3 Bc3-c2 15. Bf4-f5 Bc2xb1=T 16. Bf5xg6 Kc5-b4 17. Bg6-g7 Be6-e5 18. Th6-c6 Bf7-f6 19. Lf1-e2 Sg8-h6 20. Bg7-g8=D (2017-11-22, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stelvio 1.11 2 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 18.5, BP 19.0. KBP = 19.5. (2023-04-15, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.2 18 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 23.5, BP 24.0. (2023-05-12)
Silvio Baier: C+ (Euclide 0.93) (2009-05-12, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung: BP 14.0, BP 14.5.
BP 15.0 und BP 15.5 cooked.
Notation BP 15.0: 1.Sc3 Sc6 2.a4 b5 3.Ta3 La6 4.d3 Db8 5.Lg5 Db6 6.Lf6 0–0–0
7.e3 Kb7 8.Dg4 Dc5 9.Le2 Kb6 10.Lf3 Ka5 11.Sce2 Tb8 12.Tc3 Sd8 13.La8 De5
14.Tc6 Tb7 15.Tb6 c6
Notation BP 15.5: 1.Sc3 Sc6 2.a4 b5 3.Ta2 La6 4.Ta3 Db8 5.d3 Db6 6.Lg5 0–0–0
7.e3 Kb7 8.Dg4 Dc5 9.Le2 Kb6 10.Lf3 Ka5 11.Sce2 Tb8 12.Tc3 Sd8 13.La8 De5
14.Tc6 Tb7 15.Tb6 c6 16.Lf6.
Alles schlagfrei und ohne Umwandlung. (2023-05-20)
comment

Kostas Prentos: A correction was published in Phenix, 2009 (No.186/Pg.7979)
Solution:
1. Sf3 f5 2. Sd4 Kf7 3. Sb5 Kg6 4. Sd6 exd6 5. e4 Le7 6. e5 Lh4 7. e6 Dg5 8. e7 Dg3 9. e8=T Se7 10. Lc4 Tf8 11. 0-0 Tf6 12. f3 Kh5 13. Te1 Th6 14. Lf7+ Sg6 15. T1e6 dxe6 16. Txc8 Sd7 17. Th8 Txh8 18. Le8 (2022-12-08)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stelvio 1.2 00:33:56 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 17.5, BP 18.0.
Beispiel: 1.Sf3 f5 2.d4 Kf7 3.e4 g5 4.Lc4+ Kg6 5.e5 Lg7 6.e6 Lxd4
7.0–0 Lxb2 8.Dd6 exd6 9.e7 Kh5 10.e8S Se7 11.Te1 Tf8 12.Sxg5 Tf6
13.f3 Th6 14.Lf7+ Sg6 15.Te7 Lf6 16.Se6 dxe6 17.Td7 Lh4 18.Lg5 Dxg5
19.Sg7# (2023-05-30)
comment

Renny Bosch: This problem together with P0002238 and P0002243 form a lovely triad in each of which the rightmost three white pawns promote to a common target (Q's, R's, or B's) which subsequently get captured. Studying their similarities and differences, and what it took to make each one work, gives one a good appreciation of the art of SPG composition.

To see them all at once, enter
PROBID='P0002238' OR PROBID='P0002241' OR PROBID='P0002243'
into the search window on the home page.  (2008-03-23)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 00;56:06 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 33.0, BP 33.5. (2023-04-19)
Reto: With Stelvio 1.33, solving time drops to 20sec (2023-06-10)
comment

Alfred Pfeiffer: Die Korrekturfassung 5674v mit gleicher Forderung (fs-99, S.38): 1ss5/d1b5/lbb1b1b1/1bl5/k2t2b1/2t5/BBB2BB1/TSLDKLST soll die Duale der Urfassung (4-fach mögliches Ziehen von g7-g6) nicht mehr enthalten. (2014-11-06)
Henrik Juel: The correction mentioned by Alfred is still cooked, acc. to Euclide 1.01 (2017-11-24)
Joost de Heer: For correction see P1067393. (2023-08-18)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.0 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 21.5, BP 22.0. (2023-02-17)
comment

paul: Correction of P0000067. (2018-03-03)
Reto: The new length record for a fully tested SPG. (2023-09-18)
Olaf Jenkner: How long does it take with one core and how many cores did you use? (2023-09-18)
Reto: I used 15 seekers and 15 players, but not all of them are active all the time. My guess is that it takes about 7-10h single-threaded. (2023-09-19)
comment

Henrik Juel: Natch 3.1 tests the first 20.0 moves OK in 13 seconds, but the first 20.5 moves would take more than an hour, and the entire problem more than a couple of hours, because of the possibility of [Pd7] promoting
So we may never know for sure whether this proof game with 16 oscillations by Ta8 is correct (2018-12-08)
Mario Richter: Henrik, I think certainty about the correctness of this problem can be achieved, if we take into account that Black's last move must have been a capture. (2018-12-10)
A.Buchanan: Henrik: the times you propose for testing don't seem outrageous, even without Mario's sensible heuristic. Also, the last move must have been DxLd7 from one of 5 squares only. (2018-12-12)
Reto: Stelvio is now able to retract moves and solve the resulting problems individually. That helps a lot here, but still, the 5 reasonable last move retractions took over 13h in total to solve. (2023-06-11)
paul: 18.Tca3 & 19.T3a4 (2010-04-30, hidden) more ...
comment

paul: Checked for the first 19 moves, by Euclide. (2011-07-01)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1. Std. 16 Min.
Keine Lösung BP 24.0 (2023-02-06)
comment

This is an tutorial example of a PG deliberately including a cook.
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stelvio 1.11 13 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 14.0 bis 15.0 und 16.0. (2023-05-08, hidden) more ...
comment

The original SPG with 17... Lxf2# was cooked. In order to avoid duals the last move has to be Dxf2#
Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Danke für durchgeführten Änderungen.
Keine Lösung Stelvio 1.2: BP 16.0, BP 16.5. (2023-05-30)
Silvio Baier: 1.Sh3 d5 2.Sf4 Kd7 3.Sxd5 Kc6 4.Sxe7+ Kb5 5.Sxc8 Le7 6.Sb6 ab 7.Tg1 Ta3 8.Th1 Th3 9.f3 Sa6 10.Kf2 Lh4+ 11.Kg1 Sf6 12.De1 Dd4+ 13.Df2 Td8 14.De3 Td5 15.Df2 Sd7 16.De3 f6 17.Df2 und nun D:f2# ist C+ (Euclide 0.95) (2010-02-02, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Warum C+ unter dem falschen Diagramm?
Passend zur Lösung:FEN:8/1ppn2pp/np3p2/1k1r4/7b/5P1r/PPPPPqPP/RNB2BKR (2023-05-03, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stelvio 1.11 13 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung BP 19.0, BP 19.5 Cooked.
Beispiel BP 19.5:
1.d3 Sc6 2.Le3 Tb8 3.Ld4 Sf6 4.e3 Sh5 5.Dg4 b5 6.Ke2 La6 7.De6 b4
8.g4 Lb5 9.Lg2 b3 10.axb3 f6 11.Ta6 La4 12.bxa4 Sa5 13.Td6 Tb3
14.Lb7 Ta3 15.Kf3 Ta1 16.Sa3 Td1 17.Se2 Td2 18.Tb1 a6 19.Sc1 Te2 20.Lc8 (2023-05-03, hidden) more ...
comment

Henrik Juel: So Michel's proof game is not cooked; yet... (2019-09-10)
Reto: This is now the length record for a fully tested SPG. (2023-09-17)
paul: Cooked: 1.a3 g5 2.Sh3 a5 3.Sf4 a4 4.Sg6 hxg6 5.Ra2 Rh4 6.h3 Rb4 7.h4 Ra5 8.h5 Bg7 9.Rh4 Be5 10.Rd4 Bh2 11.g3 Kf8 12.Bg2 Kg7 13.Bc6 Kf6 14.Kf1 Qf8 15.Kg2 Qh6 16.Kf3 g4+ 17.Ke4 Qf4+ 18.Kd3 Kg5 19.gxf4+ Kh4 20.Qe1 Kh3 21.Qd1 g3 22.Ra1 g2 23.Qh1 g1=S 24.Qd5 Sf3 25.Qc5 Kg2 26.Qc4 Kf1 27.Qc5 Ke1 28.Qc4 Kd1 29.Qd5 Kxc1 30.Qb3 axb3 31.Ra2 bxa2 32.h6 axb1=S 33.h7 Sc3 34.h8=R Sa4 35.Rh5 Sb6 36.Rb5 Sa8 37.Rb6 Sg5 38.Ra6 Sh7 39.Ra7 b6 40.Rb7 Ra7 41.Bd5 Sa6 42.Rb8 Bb7 43.Ba2 Bd5 44.Bb1 Ba2 45.b3 Kb2 46.Rf8 Ka1 47.Kc3 Bg1.[N. Plaksin, Die Schwalbe 130/1991] (2019-09-09, hidden)
paul: Comparing the obtained positions, it was observed that the pawn in the g6 must be at f6. A mistake by the publishers, but mine! (2019-09-10, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Cooked Stellung Stelvio 1.11 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 9.5, BP 10.0.
Eine Notation von Stelvio:
1.Sf3 e6 2.Se5 Df6 3.Sxd7 Kd8 4.Sxb8 Ld7 5.Sc6+ Kc8 6.Sxa7+ Kb8
7.a4 Lb5 8.axb5 Txa7 9.b6 Ka8 10.bxc7 Ta4 11.Txa4#
Schlüsselwort Rochade? (2023-05-02)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 00:09:39 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 22.0, BP 22.5. (2023-03-26, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 19.5, BP 20.0.
KBP = 20.5, #1 = Te3#. (2023-05-10)
comment

paul: Correction of P1001275 (2010-05-08)
A.Buchanan: Does it have to end in a check which is in some sense a defect if unnecessary. Can it be 24. … Db3+ 25. Kd1 b5 26. Ke1 b4 (2023-06-13)
Joost de Heer: 24... Qb3+ 25. Kd1 is illegal. (2023-06-13)
A.Buchanan: Well clearly 24... Qxb2+ then same idea (2023-06-13)
comment

Korrektur siehe P0008426.
James Malcom: What is the cook? (2023-05-02)
paul: Missing wQd1. (2010-05-04, hidden) more ...
comment

paul: Verified by Jacobi with this input:

stip dia 6
forsyth rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/8/4K3/5Q2/PPPP1PPP/RN3BNR
cond cavaliermaj (2023-06-16)
Mu-Tsun Tsai: Wait, 4.Ke2 walks into check by nightrider b8, isn't it? (2012-07-15, hidden)
Henrik Juel: You are right, Mu-Tsun, but this seems to work:
1.Nxe7 Nxe2 2.Nb1 Nxc1 3.Df3 Nca5 4.Ke2 Ngc6+ 5.Kd3 Nb8 6.Ke4 Ng8+
where the black nightriders switch places (2012-07-15, hidden)
Mu-Tsun Tsai: Yeah, I came up with the same thing. Computer check is still running to see if that's the only one. (2012-07-15, hidden)
Mu-Tsun Tsai: Hum... Probably have to give up computer check. The estimated run time is simply ridiculous. I'll just believe that this corrected solution is unique. (2012-07-15, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: C+ Stelvio 8 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 25.5. (2023-06-24)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stevio 1.11 00:49:45 Minuten.(hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP20.0, BP 20.5. (2023-03-16)
Henrik Juel: Hello Moldenhauer
Your tests with Stelvio are much appreciated
Did you notice any improvement by version 1.11 over version 1.0? (2023-03-16)
Moldenhauer: Hallo Henrik Juel
Danke! Seit der neuen Version Stelvio 1.11 hat sich die Anzahl der Strategien reduziert.
Beispiel: P1000406 von 6775 auf 4994, was natürlich das Tempo erhöht. Habe ich zufällig bemerkt.
Dieses Beispiel habe ich auch gespeichert. Herr Reto Aschwanden schrieb glaube ich auch darüber.
Bei mir laufen immer mehrere Stelvios gleichzeitig. Vielleicht ist mein Rechner deshalb
gegenüber anderen langsamer. AMD Ryzen 3950X 16 Kerne 3 Jahre alt. (2023-03-16)
Henrik Juel: Thanks, Moldenhauer (2023-03-20)
comment

paul: Correction of P0005875. (2011-06-02)
paul: Dans une version ultérieure, Mr.Leroy a remplacé 30.-a6 avec 30.-a5. Dans un e-mail, il m'a expliqué: La version de ce problème avec 30...a6 a été démolie par Thierry le Gleuher, d'une manière presque plus compliquée que la solution
de l'auteur. En résumé de sa démolition, le PN en a6 peut n'avoir joué qu'un seul coup, mais par b7xa6!
La version avec le PN en a5 est donc une correction de ce grave défaut.
Donc, Thierry, quel était cette démolition explicitement? (2011-06-09)
paul: Démoli(T. le Gleuher) : 1.c4 g5 2.Da4 g4 3.D×a7 g3 4.f4 g×h2 5.Df2 Ta3 6.Rd1 Tf3 7.a4 e5 8.a5 e4 9.a6 e3 10.Ta5 e×f2 11.Ch3 Cf6 12.Tg1 h×g1=C 13.Th5 Ce4 14.c5 Cg5 15.c6 Fc5 16.e4 0-0 17.Fc4 f1=F 18.F×f7+ Rg7 19.e5 Fb5 20.Fc4 Tf6 21.Ff1 Ce2 22.Cg1 Dg8 23.e6 Th6 24.Th1 Th2 25.e×d7 h5 26.d8=D Fe6 27.Dd3 Fa2 28.Dc2 Db3 29.Re1 Rh6 30.Dd1 b×a6 31.Ca3 Cd7 32.Cc2 Ff2?
La correction avec 30.-a5 a été publié dans Europe-Échecs 452/1997. (2011-06-12)
Joost de Heer: The position with a5 is also cooked:
1. h4 Nf6 2. h5 Ne4 3. h6 Ng5 4. hxg7 h5 5. a4 h4 6. a5 h3 7. a6 h2 8. axb7 hxg1=N 9. Ra6 Rh2 10. Rg6 a5 11. e4 fxg6 12. Qh5 Kf7 13. e5 gxh5 14. e6+ Kg6 15. exd7 e5 16. Na3 e4 17. c4 e3 18. c5 e2 19. c6 Bc5 20. f4 Qg8 21. d8=N Be6 22. Nf7 Nd7 23. b8=Q Ba2 24. Qb3 exf1=B 25. Ne5+ Kh6 26. Qd1 Qb3 27. g8=B Bb5 28. Bc4 Re8 29. Bf1 Ne2 30. Nf3 Re3 31. Ng1 Rf3 32. Nc2 Bf2# (2023-07-26)
comment

D. Meinking: Comm., USPB 1995-1997 (2002-07-06)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Natch 3.3 in 45 Std. 46 Min.
Bei 16.5, 17.0 keine Lösung. BP 18.0 64 Lösungen.
C+ Euclide 1.11 in 44 Std. 07 Min. (2023-01-10)
A.Buchanan: This is a cool problem with tempo loss for both players (bK9 & wPf2). Noam likes to end proof games with checkmate, and in this case I guess it serves to eliminate shorter solutions which would otherwise save half a move. Checking 16.5 is sufficient for soundness. Thanks for taking the time to test. (2023-01-11)
A.Buchanan: Bit baffled how there can be 64 solutions in 18.0 moves since White just moved. 18.5 maybe? (2023-01-11)
ras@bsiag.com: Quickly checked because 45h seemed a lot for only 17.5 moves and only a few captures: Stelvio 0.98 is done in 210 seconds. (2023-01-11)
ras@bsiag.com: Well, Stelvio treats shorter solutions of same parity as cooks, so any shorter solution in 16.5, 15.5 etc would have been found by checking for 17.5. But anyhow, quickly checking 16.5 is done in a few seconds, finding no solution (of course). (2023-01-12)
A.Buchanan: Thanks for this. In order to be sure that no shorter solution exists, I’d also check 16.0. I agree it’s unlikely that there would be a solution, but it’s quick to check, for completeness (2023-01-11, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 5 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 26.0, BP 26.5. (2023-03-30)
comment

Moldenhauer: Ergänzung: Stelvio 1.2. Keine Lösung BP 15.0, BP 15.5. (2023-05-20)
comment

Kostas Prentos: Here is a computer tested correction: PG 12,5

1. a4 e6 2. Ta3 Ld6 3. Tb3 Lg3 4. Tb6 axb6 5. hxg3 Txa4 6. Th6 Ta1 7. Tg6 hxg6 8. Sa3 Th1 9. Sc4 Dh4 10. Sa5 bxa5 11. e3 b6 12. Dh5 gxh5 13. gxh4

C+ Euclide v1.11 (42 h 2 min 37 sec} (2022-12-08)
Michel Caillaud: cooked by Stelvio 0.92 :
1.a3 e6 2.h4 Lxa3 3.Sxa3 h5 4.Sb5 Th6 5.Ta6 Tf6 6.Tb6 Tf3 7.Sd4 Th3 8.Sc6 Txh1 9.Sxd8 axb6 10.Sc6 Ta1 11.Sa5 bxa5 12.g3 b6 13.Lg2 Lb7 14.Kf1 Lxg2+ 15.Ke1 Lh3 (2022-12-03, hidden) more ...
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.2 03:15:11 Stunden. (hh:mm:ss)
C+ Euclide 1.11 01:00:47 Stunde.
Stelvio und Euclide finden nur 1 Lösung! Warum cooked?
Keine Lösung: BP12.5, BP 13.0.
Notation: 1.a4 Sf6 2.a5 Tg8 3.a6 bxa6 4.Txa6 Lb7 5.Txf6 a5 6.Txf7 Sa6
7.Txf8+ Kxf8 8.h4 De8 9.h5 Dxh5 10.f3 Dxf3 11.Sh3 Da3 12.e3 Te8
13.Lxa6 Lc8 14.0–0+#
Epaulettenmatt durch Rochade ist OK. (2023-05-28)
comment

Moldenhauer: Die hier genannte Lösung Cook: hat am Ende die schwarze Dame auf h4
und den schwarzen Springer auf e7. Die FEN sind anders. Bitte löschen.
Autorenlösung? FEN?
Computerprüfung: FEN:1Q4nb/2p2rrp/2p1kpbp/5p1q/p1n5/8/2P1PP1P/RNBQKBNR
Cooked Stelvio 1.4 nach 3 Sekunden. Keine Lösung: BP 24.5.
Stelvio Beispiel: 1.a4 Sc6 2.d4 Sa5 3.d5 Sc4 4.d6 a5 5.g4 b5 6.axb5 a4
7.b6 f5 8.b7 Kf7 9.b8=S Ke6 10.Sc6 De8 11.g5 dxc6 12.d7 Dh5 13.d8=D Ld7
14.g6 Le8 15.D8d2 Sf6 16.Dh6 gxh6 17.g7 Lg6 18.g8=T Lg7 19.Tf8 Tg8
20.b4 Lh8 21.b5 Tg7 22.b6 Sg8 23.Tf6+ exf6 24.b7 Tf8 25.b8D Tff7 (2023-07-29)
comment

Vladimir Rey: C+ Natch 3.2 - Solution found: 1. Positions analysed: 51578. Resolution time: 5 h 33 mn 32.84 s. (2020-05-08)
Vladimir Rey: Check please: Keywords Tempo Loss. (2022-09-05)
comment

paul: Checked with Euclide for the first 19 moves (~45 min) (2014-07-04)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 00:02:47 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 23.0, BP 23.5. (2023-04-01, hidden) more ...
comment

paul: Cooked by: 1.h3 d5 2.Rh2 Bxh3(ph2) 3.Sxh3(Bc8) Bxh3 4.g4 a5 5.Bg2 Bxg4(pg2) 6.c4 a4 7.b4 e6 8.Bb2 Bxb4(pb2) 9.Sa3 Ra5 10.Qxa4(pa7) Qc8 11.QxKe8(Ke8) (suicide of wQ)b5 12.Sc2 dxc4(pc2) 13.a3 Bxe2(pe2) 14.Ra2 Bxa3(pa2) 15.Kd1 b4. (2010-06-19)
Arnold Beine: Here is something wrong. Either Paul's cook does not work, because 10.Qxa4(Pa7)+ is a check (10...Qc8??) or in the given condition "Rex inclusive" must be added. (2023-07-26)
comment

Michel Caillaud: cooked by Stelvio 0.93 :
1.a4 Sa6 2.Ta3 Sb8 3.Tg3 c6 4.Tg6 hxg6 5.Sh3 Th4 6.Sf4 Tg4 7.h4 Tg3 8.Th3 Ta3 9.h5 Ta1 10.Ta3 Da5 11.c3 Db4 12.Db3 Dc5 13.Db6 axb6 14.Kd1 Ta5 15.Ta2 Tb5 16.h6 Tb3 17.h7 Ta3 18.b3 Dxf2 19.Tc2 T3a2 20.h8=T Tb2 21.Th3… (2022-12-19)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: a) C+ Stelvio 1.11 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 13.0, BP 13.5. KBP = 14.0.
b) Stelvio 1.11 hat noch keine Funktion dafür.
Die Lösung zu b) ist wegen 6. g8=L nicht korrekt. (2023-05-10)
Henrik Juel: The given solution to part b) is (probably) correct
During the play White promotes to L, but this L is captured later, so it is not in the diagram position (2023-05-10)
Moldenhauer: Danke Henrik Juel! Der Läufer ist wieder geschlagen worden und somit nicht in der Diagrammstellung.
Das Schlüsselwort "Non-standard material" deutet auch darauf hin. Also Lösung b) korrekt! (2023-05-10)
comment

paul: Checked the first 16.5 moves with Euclide. (2014-12-04)
paul: Thr first 17.5 moves checked by Euclide (~29 hours) (2014-12-06)
Joost de Heer: Solution:
1. Nf3 b5 2. Nd4 Bb7 3. Nxb5 Bxg2 4. Nxa7 c6 5. Nc8 Rxa2 6. Nc3 Rxb2 7. Ra8
Qa5 8. Na2 Qxd2+ 9. Kxd2 Na6 10. Kc3 Nc5 11. Qd4 Rxc2+ 12. Kb4 Rxe2 13. Ba3
Rxf2 14. Ba6 h5 15. Ra1 Bf1 16. Qxg7 Rxh2 17. Qxg8 Rh4+ 18. Qg4 Bh6 19. Ka5
Bc1 20. Qa4 Rh6 21. Na7# (2001-11-05, hidden)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Natch 3.3 in 302 Std. 48 Min.
Lösung 1 (Stellung 3391) Notation OK. (2022-11-24, hidden) more ...
comment

Henrik Juel: This is one of the proof games that is solved faster by hand than by computer
The two captures are obvious, and the interchanged rooks make a guess like Th1-g1-g3-h3-h5-g5-g8-h8-a8 reasonable
Natch 3.1 got nowhere in an hour (2018-12-10)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.0 40 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 21.5, BP 22.0. (2023-02-26)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 in 1 Sekunde.
Keine Lösung: BP 22.0, BP 22.5. (2023-03-27)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 4 Sekunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 26.5, BP 27.0. (2023-03-30)
comment

paul: Sol.: 1.g3 h5 2.Bh3 Rh6 3.Kf1 Re6 4.Kg2 f6 5.Kf3 Re3+ 6.Kf4 e5+ 7.Kf5 Bb4 8.Kg6 Qe7 9.Kh7 Qc5 10.Kxg8 d6 11.Kxg7 Bg4 12.Kg6 Bf3 13.exf3 Re1 14.Se2 Rg1 15.Kf5 Rg2 16.Re1 a5 17.Sg1 a4 18.Re3 Ra5 19.Rb3 axb3 20.Ke4 bxa2 21.Kd3 e4+ 22.Ke2 e3 23.Ke1 (Ra4 is in a5)
The King captures an officer on its place and return.
For comparison, see P1013070 and P1007320 (2008-04-25)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.0 09:10:17 Stunden.
Keine Lösung: BP 21.5, BP 22.0, Prüfzeit 02:01:51 Stunden. (2023-02-17)
Reto: A good example of Stelvio's progress: Stelvio 1.5 only needs 40min on my notebook. (2023-08-19)
comment

Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: Stelvio 1.4 Keine Lösung: BP 18.5. (2023-08-17)
comment

Henrik Juel: Natch 3.1 made no progress after half an hour (2018-12-13)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 00:03:45 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 23.0, BP 23.5. (2023-04-01, hidden) more ...
comment

paul: Here, we have also an interchange between Bc1 and Bf8. (2018-03-21)
Henrik Juel: The months should be 11-12, not 09 (2018-03-21)
Mario Richter: @Henrik: Is my guess correct that "9" might be the issue number? (i.e. issue 9 of 1998 was for the months Nov.+Dec.?) (2018-03-21)
Henrik Juel: No, Mario; I think the error might have occurred, because Andrej also had a proof game in the preceding issue
Back then PB had six issues per year, numbered 1-6 for each year (unlike Die Schwalbe), so the issue number contains little information
This problem appeared in issue 6, Nov-Dec 1998 (2018-03-21)
Henrik Juel: Natch 3.1 did not even find the solution in an hour (2018-12-10)
Moldenhauer: Computerprüfung: C+ Stelvio 1.11 00:49:22 Minuten. (hh:mm:ss)
Keine Lösung: BP 25.0, BP 25.5. (2023-04-06, hidden) more ...
comment